| Sladekova, M., Poupa, V. L., & Field, A. P. (2025). Sources of bias in general linear models: Evaluating the analytic practice in psychological research. Accepted for publication in Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wc42b |
 |
| Sladekova, M., & Field, A. P. (2025). Robust Statistical Methods and the Credibility Movement of Psychological Science. PeerJ 13:e20043. https://peerj.com/articles/20043/ |
|
| Sladekova, M., & Field, A. P. (2025). Quantifying Heteroscedasticity in Linear Models Using Quantile LOWESS Intervals. Accepted for publication in Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gn4mr |
|
| Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Clelland, H. T, [et al., including Sladekova, M.] (2025). Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences. Accepted for publication in Nature. https://osf.io/q5h2c |
|
| Sladekova, M., & Field, A. P. (2024). Commonly Used Statistical Models in Psychology are Not Equipped to Deal with Real-World Conditions: A Simulation. PsyArxiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xb4at |
|
| Sladekova, M., & Field, A. P. (2024). In Search of Unicorns: Assessing Statistical Assumptions in Real Psychology Datasets. PsyArxiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4rznt |
|
| Sladekova, M., & Field, A. P. (2024). Psychology Researchers’ Self-Reported Knowledge of Sources of Bias in General Linear Models and How it Affects Their Analytic Practice. PsyArxiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uhswb |
|
| Sladekova, M. (2024). Robust Statistical Methods and the Credibility Movement of Psychological Science. PhD Thesis. https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/thesis/Robust_statistical_methods_and_the_credibility_movement_of_psychological_science/27332835?file=50081895 |
|
| Bartoš, F., Maier, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Nippold, F., Doucouliagos, H., Ioannidis, J., Otte, W. M., Sladekova, M., Fannelli, D. & Stanley, T. D. (2024). Footprint of publication selection bias on meta-analyses in medicine, economics, and psychology. Research Synthesis Methods. 15(3), 500-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1703 |
|
| Armitage, R., Iatridi, V., Sladekova, M. & Yeomans, M. (2024). Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. International Journal of Obesity. 48, 764–777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01494-7 |
|
| Sladekova, M., Webb, L. E., & Field, A. P. (2023). Estimating the change in meta-analytic effect size estimates after the application of publication bias adjustment methods. Psychological Methods. 28(3), 664–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000470 |
|
| Pownall, M., Azevedo, F., König, [et al., including Sladekova, M.] & FORRT. (2023). Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes. Royal Society Open Science 10(5), 221255. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221255 |
|
| Collins, L., Terry, J., Pownall, M., & Jones, A., Sladekova, M. (2023). UK Psychology PhD researchers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of open science. Cogent Psychology. 10(1), 2248765 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2248765 |
|
| Bartoš, F., Maier, M., Shanks, D. R., Stanley, T. D., Sladekova, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2023). Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects. Royal Society Open Science. 10(7), 230224. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230224 |
|